<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><?xml-stylesheet title="XSL formatting" type="text/xsl" href="http://eric.maziade.com/feed/rss2/xslt" ?><rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
  <title>Stuff Fancied by Eric - Dungeons and Dragons 4.0 - The Day that Music Died  - Comments</title>
  <link>http://eric.maziade.com/</link>
  <atom:link href="http://eric.maziade.com/feed/rss2/comments/63" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
  <description>Stuff that I did that I deem worth seeing.  Maybe once.  By one or two people.  At least.  I hope.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 02:52:41 -0500</pubDate>
  <copyright>All Rights Reserved</copyright>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Dotclear</generator>
  
    
    
    <item>
    <title>Dungeons and Dragons 4.0 - The Day that Music Died - Eric Maziade</title>
    <link>http://eric.maziade.com/post/2008/06/28/Dungeons-and-Dragons-40-The-Day-that-Music-Died#c424</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:md5:bd2f0b320c89562058000f9c57da4a33</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:20:09 -0400</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Eric Maziade</dc:creator>
    
    <description>For me, its a definitive thumbs up.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Most people I hear complaining about the changes are people that are really used to 3.5 - and possibly invested a lot in 3.5 material.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To this, I say: there's nothing wrong with that.&amp;nbsp; And the arrival of 4.0 doesn't mean that you have to update from 3.5.&amp;nbsp; And I don't think anyone actually really need constant updates and fresh material for 3.5 - if you love it so much that you don't want to change it then, by all means - keep playing it &lt;img src=&quot;/themes/default/smilies/smile.png&quot; alt=&quot;:)&quot; class=&quot;smiley&quot; /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That being said, I love 4.0 a lot.&amp;nbsp; I love the streamlined rules.&amp;nbsp; I love the simplified combat that is more tactical than in previous iterations.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;With 4.0, I managed to get my wife more involved in the game than she ever was in 3.5.&amp;nbsp; I managed to introduce the whole concept of table top RPGs and DnD within 30 minutes of explaining to a group of 5 10 year olds.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It feels to me like a solid system.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I've yet to play and explore it as extensively as I did ADnD and, to a lesser extent, 3.5.&amp;nbsp; But 4.0 is now my system of choice.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
  </item>
      
    
    <item>
    <title>Dungeons and Dragons 4.0 - The Day that Music Died - jonathan</title>
    <link>http://eric.maziade.com/post/2008/06/28/Dungeons-and-Dragons-40-The-Day-that-Music-Died#c423</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:md5:d302a188462eb811537b5ef368ddd48b</guid>
    <pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 21:16:41 -0400</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jonathan</dc:creator>
    
    <description>&lt;p&gt;So, after looking it over and (possibly?) playing 4E - how in your opinion does it all stack up now? Thumbs up? down? or.. still undecided?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  </item>
      
    
    <item>
    <title>Dungeons and Dragons 4.0 - The Day that Music Died - Martin</title>
    <link>http://eric.maziade.com/post/2008/06/28/Dungeons-and-Dragons-40-The-Day-that-Music-Died#c416</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:md5:ea1d3acffdf0492a0b58118c96cda833</guid>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 10:38:05 -0400</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
    
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Nah the gnome is pretty much officially a monster race now with 'hints on how to to make it a PC playable race' from some article on the main sites... *shrug*&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  </item>
      
    
    <item>
    <title>Dungeons and Dragons 4.0 - The Day that Music Died - Eric Maziade</title>
    <link>http://eric.maziade.com/post/2008/06/28/Dungeons-and-Dragons-40-The-Day-that-Music-Died#c415</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:md5:bedcca876d0b036eff6b694aa24b9287</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 23:55:12 -0400</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Eric Maziade</dc:creator>
    
    <description>I heard rumors of PHB2 (and PHB3) which would bring back other classes too (I kind of miss druids, bards, monks and sorcerers).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I'm not sure if I would prefer extra PHBs or smaller books, 1 per class.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I remember having similar frustrations when 3.0 came out - my favorite class from ADnD got nuked: no more priests.&amp;nbsp; If I wanted to play religion, I was stuck with the cleric, which back then felt like a paladin wannabe.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I still have my Priest's Handbook from ADnD - once one of my most treasured DnD-related possession &lt;img src=&quot;/themes/default/smilies/smile.png&quot; alt=&quot;:)&quot; class=&quot;smiley&quot; /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I guess they could bring back gnomes in an extra volume... but I have a feeling that they just didn't find any specific rules to put on the gnome to justify it being an extra race.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I guess we could home-build a gnome race... or just use the halfling template and call it &quot;gnome&quot;!&lt;br /&gt;</description>
  </item>
      
    
    <item>
    <title>Dungeons and Dragons 4.0 - The Day that Music Died - Martin</title>
    <link>http://eric.maziade.com/post/2008/06/28/Dungeons-and-Dragons-40-The-Day-that-Music-Died#c414</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:md5:edcf3cc3d649b4aeee9d5bfe7a9d8ab4</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 19:09:37 -0400</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
    
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Bards are gone from the core classes.. should be back in another book a bit later&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;p&gt;gnomes, on the other hand.... :\&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  </item>
      
</channel>
</rss>